•            Elementary scientist exam method

2.5-minute read published April 4th, 2024

This Socratic taboo questionnaire provides an unambiguous answer to the question of whether you are certified as an elementary scientist. Only proven elementary scientists are potential reliable sources on elementary issues. The question of whether or not you are a basic scientist with a Ph.D. is irrelevant to an elementary probandum of this article. ‘Elementary’ means most fundamental in the superset cosmos.

1.           Are you a homo sapiens? If not please state what you are. If you are a computer please shut down. If you are homo sapiens but don’t accept the Grand Goal of the decent survival of homo sapiens then please shut up and enlighten us on what your opinion is after you’ve died.

2.           Do you accept the Grand Axiom as the exclusive elementary axiomatic assumption of One Consistent Cosmos? Consistent means absolutely loophole-free complete and absolutely no contradictions in the superset cosmos. If not, then no elementary scientific discourse is possible. So, please shut up, be attentive, and return when you do. For, if real magic exists then all the science and the scientific method are per logical definition falsified. An open mind has its limits given the Grand Goal.

3.           Do you claim to have solved all the first three rising complexity levels of the elementary questions in science and do you provide all the geometry and other mathematical theorems on which all further non-pseudo infinite incomplete science can logically be based in One Law of Nature? If you don’t, please shut up, be attentive, and return when you do.

4.           Do you claim to have the elementary and basic scientific instruction manual of the instrument brain and that of the collective instrument brain as the physics of psychology based on the One Law of Human Nature that is consistent with the One Law of Nature and can you prove to have best practice applied it successfully in all of several fields? If not, please shut up, be attentive, and return when you do.

5.           Have you studied at least both of my DOI publications?

ONE LAW OF NATURE MAKES ONE LAW OF HUMAN NATURE https://zenodo.org/records/10727529

96 views and 77 uploads since March 2nd, 2024

THE UNAMBIGUOUS 1000 ELEMENTARY TERMS, DEFINITIONS, AND DESCRIPTIONS IN ELEMENTARY SCIENCE, COURTROOMS, AND SCHOOLS https://zenodo.org/records/10254851

317 views and 243 uploads since December 15th, 2023

If not, please shut up, be attentive, and come back when you very precisely and respectfully can show any data that is incorrect or not dealt with that you or others have consistently dealt with. If any such major error amounting to valid falsification exists it should be very easy to be shown. This is logical because the claim in this model is that it’s all classical mechanics. When anyone shows minor errors or omissions * that no doubt always will exist * these are irrelevant when corrected after giving a reasonable time to do so. This is because nitpicking is a fallacy. That science will always be incomplete is not inconsistent with having all elementary science as the simple rules and first three bases of the unfathomably complex game of the tree like the Tower of Science and Life. Basic ‘if it works it works, don’t ask why science’ is a reality of basic science yet falsified as elementary science that requires proven know-why workability. The latter is proven by showing to have followed the prescribed procedure and by giving access to all the raw data containing the statistics proving the claimed best practice track record. The raw data is on my blog and site linked in the articles. Current Science is based on a falsified implicit claim of best practices because by theorem proven unsolvable and disgracefully demands absolute proof which they acknowledge to be impossible.

 •           Welcome Certifiable Elementary Scientists

After having passed these examination questions, by answering them in the affirmative, as I claim to prove to have done, or posing valid opposition then I welcome you as an elementary scientist. Take it as a fact that you are telling the truth. Because elementary scientists are eternal students, you can drop out of this school of thought and action at any moment. We are thus at best all potential elementary scientists as soon as and as long as we comply with the One Law of Nature. Any dropout can thus always reenter. My Geno/ species personality-speed of brain type is a DG4m. For my further assessment, I revert you to the Elementary List.