DUE TO MY FOCUS ON UKRAINE I BELATEDLY CAME ACROSS VERITASIUM AND NOW A CRITIQUE THAT BOTH CHANGED MY WAY OF MODELING ELECTROMAGNETISM IN OUR BRAIN AS A QM COMPUTER.

https://www.science20.com/hontas_farmer/veritasium_is_still_wrong_about_how_electricity_actually_works_by_his_own_standards-256034#:~:text=Physics%20%3E%20Quantum%20Gravity-,Veritasium%20Is%20Still%20Wrong%20About%20How%20Electricity%20Actually%20Works%2C%20By,Standards%2C%20And%20Circuit%20Quantum%20Electrodynamics.&text=Veritasium%20is%20still%20wrong%20by,theory%20of%20electricity%20and%20magnetism.

https://www.science20.com/…/veritasium_is_still_wrong….

As stated at first the difference between a normal computer and a human brain is that electrons being larger than photons they travel slower than c through the Higgs-graviton fields. And I stated that due to magnetism being in my model > c yet arcing we humans react faster than robots.

This all has to do with the Maxwell equations.

I didn’t address the problem succinct enough.

A. Electrons can move along a conductor akin to water through a water hose.

B. Yet they also can bump against each other and send a magnetic wave along the path of that conductor.

My first idea was something in between these two methods. This discussion about Veritasium has led me to a new insight that indeed QM entanglement is at the heart of the different reaction speeds of mammal brains and robots. The mammal brains have a trick to having the electrons only bump against each other. Being entangled then the magnetic wave is less diffuse than we can currently achieve in normal nonquantum computers. In mammal brains, the QM soldiers stand in order, and in normal computers, they are in order disorder.

So yes, of course, QM computers are possible to build. Yet science should start looking at the problem as a classical mechanical problem.

ZIEL CLASSICAL QM POSSIBLE?