5 Comments


  1. ·

    Why do you think “normality” (as in normal vs. abnormal) has anything whatsoever to do with “the normal distribution” (as in normal vs. Cauchy vs. double exponential vs. Poisson vs. negative binomial vs. hypergeometric …)?

    Sent from my iPad

    Reply

    1. ·

      Normality of the normal distribution is the n = very high average discrete i.e. quanta working of all particles interacting with the Galton board working of the dynamic Higgs & graviton fields.

      In this model those fields are a minute part of the required cosmos, namely akin the crust of the earth and atmosphere. As thin as the peel of an apple. Only there is the dynamic moving mass construct of space where that Galton board effect happens. Yet that is all we can observe in our little observational bubble of observable universe.

      So for our perceived reality in our timeframe abnormality is norm. Akin any individual Galton board reading. Yet in a time frame ceteris paribus algorithms can appear in a host of seeming chaotic data such as the amok algorithm of Ingo Piepers. Change the attitude of the Galton board in the Higgs field and you change that outcome.

      This is physics Richard and not mathematics other than mathematics required to describe the physical deepest reality. BTW that deeper reality of the normal distributed easy to difficult thus less probable deformation of the Velcro Lego Gods particle is analog, and thus not discrete. As depicted in the picture of that best practice proven prime suspect particle. It depends thus at what level of focus / wave length we are “looking” using logical fantasy at the particles, what sort of mathematics you’d best use.

      Any interaction of any particle – like the smallest of them all the photon – with the Higgs field or any other field for that matter will cause a standard deviation that is “illegal” from the position of any of the Theories of Einstein. The mathematics that he used to stunning success demands that there is absolutely no interaction other than with some sporadic matter and apart from that always curved space time as curved nothing. The latter is illegal per my Grand Postulate. As Einstein in effect agreed knowing that he hadn’t yet solved gravity. All his mathematics collapse when any interaction at all is even assumed. Its taboo. That is hypnotics at play.

      Einstein also hated the constants such as c. Well indeed it’s an average. The maximum speed in any given time frame of the string can vary. Yet in a Nirvana of one gods particle it touches that v max only once every extremely long time on a cosmological timescale. The latter far slower even than the astronomical timescale that also eludes science. Namely that maximum pressure is in this model when the required pressure vessel is at first under construction.

      I have cracked it in the sense that I can provide via painting a classical mechanical logical explanation picture of the paradoxes involved. It’s all logical and has predictable and further testable implications.

      And, it can prevent WW3 according to Ingo next year already. For its robotics.

      Reply

    2. ·

      One very important add Richard. The paradox also stems from the fact that the curved space dynamic Galton board we are in is so bloody small namely the eight sizes of Gluons that it presents itself mostly as non discrete. Yet is is. Only when going so small that we can’t observe it anymore does it indeed become a analog distribution.

      Reply

  2. ·

  3. ·

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *