Published ZENODO December 4, 2023 | Version v1

https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.10254850

Dataset  Open

Creators

• Ris, Gerhard

Description

At least in Elementary Science, Courtrooms, and Schools all professionally used elementary terms, definitions, and descriptions should be unambiguous. This is a train-your-brain list by going through this prescriptive list.  Search functions make an alphabetical list unnecessary. More detailed background: All used words are consistent with the Oxford Dictionary in the context of elementary science unless set in bold. When inconsistent the Oxford Dictionary is amended.  No scientific dictionary makes this distinction. Within the elementary context and goal, lexicographers and scientists should go about improving i.e. correcting this list. Here I show by systematically splitting the terms ‘basic’ and ‘elementary’ that it’s possible in a reductio ad absurdum proof that one simple law of nature makes one-simple law of human nature based on five exclusive objective axiomatic assumptions based on five subjective wise goals for homo sapiens. This can be reduced to one goal of the bare survival of homo sapiens and the assumption of one consistent cosmos. Not accepting this grand axiom and grand goal is per logical definition anti-scientific pseudo-science. Accepting this prevents premature extinction which is inevitable without this scientific paradigm change.

Files