Article published

https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.10727528

The basic psychological fact that different intelligence and personality types can’t understand each other has led to the mounting global amok. The task of the legal sciences is to know how conflicts arise, and how to put an end to conflicts and keep them ended. The know-why has eluded humanity.  Most also know that classical mechanics, general relativity, and quantum mechanics are at odds. Here I show that following a well-known legal crime scene procedure with very few slight twists proves the thesis of one law of nature as one law of human nature of which all the theorems were in long ago. The theorem of John Bell on quantum entanglement falsifies the axioms of the antithesis. It’s a non-elementary reality as basic local laws of science. By default, there is no reason that the cosmos isn’t classical mechanics and thus governed by simple rules. The grand axiom and grand goal of homo sapiens prove the thesis via the strongest possible reductio ad absurdum proof combined with the weakest proof of convincing circumstantial evidence. All data taken into evidence shows only data pro requiring one idea for the proof. Preventing pestering very practically produces peace and prosperity in our time.

• Elementary scientist exam method

This Socratic taboo questionnaire provides an unambiguous answer to the question if you are certified as an elementary scientist. Only proven elementary scientists are potential reliable sources on elementary issues. The question of whether or not you are a basic scientist with a Ph.D. is irrelevant to an elementary probandum of this article. ‘Elementary’ means most fundamental in the superset cosmos.

1. Are you a homo sapiens? If not please state what you are. If you are a computer please shut down. If you are homo sapiens but don’t accept the Grand Goal of the bare survival of homo sapiens then please shut up and enlighten us on what your opinion is after you’ve died.
2. Do you accept the Grand Axiom as the exclusive elementary axiomatic assumption of One Consistent Cosmos? Consistent means absolutely loophole-free complete and absolutely no contradictions in the superset cosmos. If not, then no elementary scientific discourse is possible. So, then please shut up, be attentive, and come back when you do. For if real magic exists then all the science and the scientific method are per logical definition falsified. An open mind has its limits given the Grand Goal.
3. Do you claim to have solved all the first three rising complexity levels of the elementary questions in science and do you provide all the geometry and other mathematical theorems on which all further non-pseudo infinite incomplete science can logically be based in One Law of Nature? If you don’t, then please shut up, be attentive, and come back when you do.
4. Do you claim to have the elementary and basic scientific instruction manual of the instrument brain and that of the collective instrument brain as the physics of psychology based on the One Law of Human Nature that is consistent with the One Law of Nature and can you prove to have best practice applied it successfully in all of several fields? If not, then please shut up, be attentive, and come back when you do.
5. Have you studied the linked Zenodo article?  If not, then please shut up, be attentive, and come back when you very precisely and respectfully can show any data that is incorrect or not dealt with that you or others have consistently dealt with. If any such major error amounting to valid falsification exists it should be very easy to be shown. This is logical because the claim in this model is that it’s all classical mechanics. When anyone shows minor errors or omissions * that no doubt always will exist * these are irrelevant when corrected after giving a reasonable time to do so. This is because nitpicking is a fallacy. That science will always be incomplete is not inconsistent with having all elementary science as the simple rules and first three bases of the unfathomably complex game of the tree like the Tower of Science and Life. Basic ‘if it works it works, don’t ask why science’ is a reality of basic science yet falsified as elementary science that requires proven know-why workability. The latter is proven by showing to have followed the prescribed procedure and by giving access to all the raw data containing the statistics proving the claimed best practice track record.

• Welcome Certifiable Elementary Scientists

After having passed these examination questions, by answering them in the affirmative, as I claim to prove to have done, or posing valid opposition then I welcome you as an elementary scientist. Take it as a fact that you are telling the truth. Because elementary scientists are eternal students, you can drop out of this school of thought and action at any moment. We are thus at best all potential elementary scientists as soon as and as long as we comply with the One Law of Nature. Any dropout can thus always reenter. My Geno/ species personality-speed of brain type is a DG4m. For my further assessment and the jargon, methods, and standards of the article I revert you to the Elementary List (EL) titled The Unambigious 1000 Elementary Terms, Definitions, And Descriptions in Elementary Science, Courtrooms, And Schools. The link is in the linked article.