**Can Nobel Prizes in Physics prove anything in Physics? **

Is Albert Einstein indeed proven wrong?

An open-source challenge.

20-minute read

The Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 was awarded jointly to Alain Aspect, John F. Clauser and Anton Zeilinger “for experiments with entangled photons, establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science”

https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2022/summary/

Mind, I’m in no way stating that the Nobel laureates do or don’t deserve the prizes. That is a totally different issue.

Albert Einstein — ‘*If you can’t explain it to a six-year-old, you don’t understand it yourself*.’

As one can read in this blog post by my friend emeritus professor of statistics Richard Gill KNAW polarisation plays a role in the experiments that are involved.

All Richards publications are all available in public free archives including arXiv.org, as well as on his own personal Leiden University web pages, academia.Edu and researchgate.com.

The only problem is I can’t find the Gill theorem on Bell inequalities.

That theorem proves if I understand the claim correctly that Bell inequalities are unsolvable. The only logical conclusion then would be that we humans, even when using the collective brain properly, are too stupid to grasp the solution to the problem.

CLEVER BACTERIA?!

As far as my knowledge goes no one in science disputes that we humans stem from a collection of a symbiotic cooperation lump of different bacteria. These bacterial ancestors of humanity have proven to be sufficiently fit as survival of the fittest in our cosmic bubble. Our individual brains as part of a collective brain must have been completely consistent with all the fundamental laws of physics in that bubble.

Otherwise, humanity wouldn’t even have emerged in the first place.

There is no reason to believe that this has changed provided all humans cooperate in a completely consistent way. When we humans however have changed our biotope faster than our symbiotically working collective brains can cope with, we indeed might go extinct in a nuclear winter.

Mind, that current science taking my model as a fact is a collection of small Ivory Towers as set theory boxes containing true valid exact science. There is however also and especially in soft science when using statistics much anti-scientific pseudo-science going on in the world’s universities and scientific institutions. The existence of Science in Transition which is I guess now brain dead for years is proof of these problems.

The predominant Copenhagen interpretation is under much pressure and in a desperate fight to hold on to the power of funding in a lost cause. The primary problem is that this also is the root cause of most conflicts attempting to elevate incomplete and inconsistent science as something else than occult pseudoscience. The oligarchs of science are doubling down to stay in power by funding their religious belief that dictates “shut up and calculate.”

After step 1 giving my Wikipedia-style interpretation of physics and astronomy in 2010 in my blog post containing this easy test that is reproducible by anyone, I’ve given a somewhat lengthy step 2 as a basis for this shorter post.

A proof that can be explained to nigh any twelve to eighteen-year-old high school kid who has had sufficient Bildung.

A picture of three polaroid sunglasses proving that the current theories of Einstein on QM & GR are weird.

Instead of becoming darker when a third glass is squeezed in between two polaroid glasses at a 90o-angle, it becomes lighter! The three glasses are arranged at twice a 45o angle. The glasses let some photons thru with 100% of their energy. Yet only polarized conform to the polarisation of the last glass. A beam of light being many photons (light particles predicted by Albert Einstein) is somewhat degraded, but less so than one would expect. This is weird in a way that the science * even in 2022 * isn’t ‘in’. For then a Nobel prize would have been granted.

Well, you might think, that the Nobel prize is now given. Ah, no, as the Gill Theorem and the incompleteness theorems of Godel prove the oligarchs of exact science state together with their religious followers it’s unsolvable.

That there are many more weird things in QM & GR isn’t a disproof of this proof. Current science still speaks of quantum weirdness. So, QED, the current scientific paradigm in 2022 is still as weird as it was in 2010. The incomplete weirdness that Einstein, Schrödinger, and Carroll pointed out persists. Science has mostly resigned to this situation more often than not claiming anyone stating differently to be a mad crackpot.

When weird results are got, then as a standard operating procedure (SOP) you should check axioms, definitions, conventions & goals. Before I’ll elaborate here on that let me first show a simple common sense explanation of the undisputed via valid falsification and deemed an interesting read with some claimed errors by a comment in my previous post on this topic.

http://problemswithrelativity.com/

Tom Hollings

“Sir, an interesting read, but I spotted a few errors.”

Check out this “interesting read” here:

As you can fact-check the core of the whole Copenhagen interpretation can be visualized in one A4 doodle graphic as seen here. This is explained in the mentioned interesting read.

When we take the physics as depicted here as a correct representation of the most broadly held view of the so-called Copenhagen interpretation as a fact, then that interpretation is incorrect and outright falsified validly. They have gone occult.

The occult is the belief in magic contradictions. Such as an incomplete cosmos or an inconsistent cosmos.

Also, the occult is the belief in the intergalactically improbable when a completely consistent claim is done of proven best common sense practice not receiving valid falsification after an open source challenge has been done. On that norm having followed that proper proceeding can be fact-checked.

Yet, this will get as I’ve tested many times physicists starting to get very angry. They feel trolled. It hits them in the religious gut. Albeit after several of my predictions have come true since 2010 the anger is more and more sagging off. After having found strong evidence of a Higgs field via the Higgs particle. And then finding strong evidence of gravity waves. Furthermore busting part of the standard model (SM) via splitting the deemed to be elementary Muon. You can scan through my blog. Finding an image of a photon as a Maltese cross I predicted it as a cross. Finding a hexagon matrix at the deepest levels of the cosmos as I predicted. All finds in science since 2010 are completely consistent with my classical mechanical simple common sense model of the cosmos.

The reason they show strong signs of angsiety is that the speed of light as the top speed is central to all of the theories of Einstein.

The hilarious observation of any kid stating to observe a particle depicted in this way to accelerate puts it above the speed of light. *Assumend* by physics to be the absolute top speed. Wheras it is of course an obvious average as a top speed of the boat or better helicopter construct in the observerd waves in the medium.

Anyway, the test is easier to perform with twelve-year-old kids that reside in the highest forms of education and have a talent for mathematics. Provided they are still unbiased and thus unspoiled by incorrect education on this theme, via the occult QM church religion in physics and mathematics.

A religion taught to me in high school did * with the best of intentions * not want me to think about kg.m/s^2 as energy but in terms of ‘Joules’. The latter is kg.m/s^2 when one sees it in CM. By subsequently adding much and much more religious imprinting the brain of kids are prepared in the suicidal illusion to grasp the occult. Indeed, otherwise, any career in science would be effectively blocked by the mighty peer review oligarchs in science.

The inherently Socratic question that must be asked is: Is a classical mechanical model of QM & GR possible?

A physics teacher is allowed to teach all that which no one disputes. Well, no one disputes that the maximum speed of most helicopters is dictated by the speed of sound being reached by the tip of the rotor in forwarding motion. Going faster will cause instability. This subsequently dictates that the body of the helicopter has a maximum speed of usually some 300 km/h with faster types. Seeing the photon as something with mass, and this as a construct of sorts must have parts of the construct > c.

The medium through which the energy packet goes must be a curved dynamic something containing dynamic interacting mass.

As a postulate (prime suspect/hypothesis) to get to a proven axiom (proven culprit, always open to review) a completely consistent infinite cosmos identical to one God identical to one Mother Nature is taken. Together defined under the term Physics-Mayor (pronounce physics-major). What these unbiased kids then shouldn’t already know is that in one stroke by taking this as a fact (absolutely true, without absolute proof thereof) all current mathematics (pure mathematics is later to be defined as part of meta-physics) and physics (later to be deemed as physics-minor) collapse on the most fundamental questions.

‘Identical’ means exactly equivalent. This means in whatever way one views it, it is exactly the same. Just being equal ( =) isn’t exact enough in this sense. In mathematics, you add one stripe to =.

‘Complete’ means no observational sensed in any way data (information), including logically inferred or deduced data, is to be left out of any model of this complete description of the cosmos. This completeness of the model is testable.

‘Consistent’ means that all logical conflicts are illegal. This is testable.

Amongst a large enough group of such high school kids, there will be some that come up with a solution to the polaroid paradox. Some of these will be roughly the same as my solution.

In my model, the energy packet of a photon is lead through each glass like a mirror. It can only do so at angles of 45o. Done three times doesn’t lead to any energy loss because it’s absolutely conductive. As long as the experiment is done accurately enough the weak force bond of the photon remains intact.

Namely the energy packet akin to a boat at sea on the huge sphere of earth. With a boat, it’s easier to visualize the interaction of the boat and the waves, than using a helicopter as the metaphor.

The only problem then is when confronted with the results of the M&M experiment, that the teacher should honestly give the notion that the M&M experiment is completely consistent with the notion of a curved space *dynamic* local field or non-local aether as a medium. Something I stated in 2010 and I don’t know when science caught on to this notion.

When we then take the polaroid as the bars of jail only showing half the information, then instead of a boat the energy packet is best seen as a helicopter requiring counterrotation of rotors to stay in balance causing waves in the air. Due to the bars of the jail, only one of the two rotors can be observed when still turning before detection. The damage to the photon after detection might show the illusion of it being static before the crash against the detector.

Most kids in the know of how magic tricks work will grasp that illusions are easily created when only half of the truth is shown. Here this is also the case due to the polaroid bars of the jail blocking part of what is to be observed.

In classical mechanics (CM of Newton) *all* formulas in physics can be split into the holy trinity of kg, m, s. I.e. kg = mass, meters as the length of space, and s seconds of time. They all interact in two elementary ways as kg.m/s for the strong force as potential (not yet interacting) energy and kg.m/s^2 for the weak (spinning) force as kinetic (interacting) energy in my CM model.

The Copenhagen interpretations all have curved nothing of space, something from nothing particles popping up out of nowhere and disappearing. A Big Bang theory states very weird ways of the Cosmos as a rising space cake.

In 2010 I rejected these views and came up with a completely consistent alternative that still stands. Most of the objections it has got are ridicule and anger. That isn’t a valid falsification in the sense of Karl Popper by any means. It also has had physicists ask about observations I wasn’t aware of. Every time after some remodeling my model got better and better. More elegant and simpler as well.

**OPEN SOURCE CHALLENGE: PROVE VALID FALSIFICATION OF**

**THE TEN ELEMENTARY DUALISTIC LAWS OF EVERYTHING.**

(Of the One Grand Law of Everything.)

Just simply show any illogical statement at all or any infringement with all known data. The proof lies in the fact that no one can even though several physicists have taken notice of the model. Even the ones that chose to ignore provide in that way valid evidence in support of my model. They carry the burden of disproof on the social contract with humanity.

High school kids should learn that the demand of consistency holds that when anyone with a Bildung-prepared brain can’t intuitively sense any inconsistency a claim of 99.9% probative value is valid. Until someone notices a hole in the Emmentaler cheese metaphor concept. All such holes must be plugged in by remodeling. The more people with Bildung that can’t show any incompleteness of data that isn’t addressed, the higher the probative value becomes. This process is called validation.

This model has a core that has a very high validation to the degree of an elementary (most fundamental) Law of Everything as depicted here below. That the Emmentaler cheese has softer yet to be further developed in R&D layers as ideas and concepts and theory is immaterial.

The underlying first postulate now claimed axiomatic assumption is that there are a few elementary Laws of Everything in Physics-Mayor that are observable everywhere and all the time in the infinite cosmos. Thus logically also all observable where we are at.

This, on the other hand, doesn’t mean that what can’t be observed directly can’t be proven to exist, when it’s the only logical complete consistent composition that is possible. That is a fully testable and thus exact scientific situation fit for valid falsification. The absence of such valid falsification is thus proof until disproven. Such proof of proof is always circumstantial evidence. The latter takes all known data into account and via artistic creativity fills in all holes in a completely consistent way. This and showing proper proceeding are valid exact scientific proofs.

Via the wise goals of humanity and science as stated in my blog science is definend as:

**The decent systematic search for all the laws of everything and all-inclusive Bildung. **

Anyone is challenged to pose valid falsification of this definition and come up with a better one.

THE HARDCORE LAWS OF EVERYTHING

**The First LOE **is **Physics-Minor** as a proven postulate (suspect) and thus via exact scientific norm via circumstantial evidence proven to be an axiom (culprit fit for valid falsification challenge of better best practice): The infinite cosmos is filled with an infinite amount of absolutely conductive (identical? Lateron in the 10th LOE proven best practice concept indeed identical) massive dense objects that are uniquely deformable constructs that have always interacted according to simple laws that are observable even in the smallest sphere of space-time. And thus logically describable in kg, m, s, strong interactive force kg.m/s & weak interactive angular momentum (spin) force kg.m/s^2. This is all in a dualistic at the same time all the time analog and quantified way. The current scientific description of a photon shows (= *observation*) a massive particle energy packet with the constant speed of light being an average. A photon is *observed* to interact and wave through a dynamic field construct and is *observed* to accelerate holding c in the dynamic construct of curved space causing a 1 meter (gravity) wave in that field. A photon is thus *observed* to have speeds above the speed of light. Otherwise, it is an illegal occult interpretation. It must by GLOE be possible to make an interactive movie, correctly framing all set theory domains in the infinite cosmos in a common sense way that any nonreligious, spoiled or biased high school kid with Bildung can intuitively understand. As depicted by this lawful static image given below. That the description in this 3D space contains many vectors pointing all over the place adding seeming dimensions in space and doesn’t require or even allow an occult Hilbert space. This image is completely consistent with the observed cosmos. Yet the image is not yet complete in the sense of having answered all questions. It obviously still has great holes in the Emmentaler cheese metaphor of the model of a complete cosmos to be filled in. That my model has a proven concept that has stunningly already filled many of those holes, is irrelevant. Irrelevant for the conclusion that even with this image of weights with movable rings, that in a yet-to-be-conjured-up way must be able to connect and disconnect, still by far prove best practice. This is the way I’ve proven many times to solve many crime scenes, also catching and serving due justice to conmen. Basic classical mechanical (CM) Newton dictates that when we observe in the correct focus sphere this large weight construct hit the two-weight connected to the construct, the large weight will start to wave along a virtual vector given a noncurved space. When the other two weights break up due to the impact they will accelerate in a quantifiable way because they will then spin less. Science carries the burden of disproof by showing any inconsistency or fallacy. The procedure of peer review has been given valid falsification. Science carries the burden of disproving that claim as well. If any scientist would even dare to state that they only observe a curved space as curved nothing they will get twenty verbal whacks with a stick and be forced to don the burka and shut up. Then they may act like a lampshade awaiting some authority to screw in a correct scientific lightbulb so that the light of science starts shining. Stating to observe curved nothing is occult and thus falsified validly. We observe of course a curved massive dynamic interactive something as space. That parts must be moving faster than we can directly observe, and doesn’t allow occult interpretations. Stating to have the “mathematics” only meaning algebra is a blatant Pinnochio lie. That you can’t directly observe something doesn’t prove it’s not there when it leaves traces that can lead to no other conclusion that there is a provable culprit at play.

**The Second LOE** is **The Normal Bellcurve Distribution**. Current science just needs a change of terms. No scientist will dare object that given n = high statistical data on any problem in the correct set theory domain, correct modeling will always show the normal bell curve distribution. The combining algorithm of four other algorithms. The four distribution algorithms are flat, edge, curve, and broken distributions in a dualistic way continuous (analog) and quantified (digital). All the time every time in space-time. “Normal” as in conforming to the norm and not as a plumbline akin to a clapper of a bell clock. Mathematics teachers are reasoning like Quasimodo hearing bells and stringing up their students hung by the neck as being “normal”. Forbidden use of the English language on the Social Contract with humanity in schools or courtrooms. The 2nd LOE is the statistical chance probability bridge between the 1st and 3rd LOE. QED!

**The Third LOE** is **Bayes Physics**. The theorem of Pierre Laplace in the Physics Interpretation of Bayes. No scientist will dare object to the correctness of this theorem or my physics of Bayes. The latter never had a theorem or philosophy but more correctly put he invented the language for physics-mayor. All-encompassing description method of Physics-Mayor (pronounced “major”; my model => my use of spelling.) in a completely consistent analog/digital way. Picture-salad via communication Word-salad towards Course Number-salad and Fine Number-salad algorithms combined in the Mixed-salad algorithm in a continuous and discrete (analog/quantified) way. Pure mathematics is Meta-physics. Algebra is always a mixed salad whether the primarily quick and dirty essential for survival course salad or done as a rigorously fine salad. Completely consistent with the incompleteness LOL theorems of Kurt Godel. Godel is dead and science should keep him buried in his hexagon box with the lid on. Don’t let that living dead loony toon zombie haunt you. Godel proved by his theorems that current mathematics hasn’t solved the axiomatic, term, definition, and proper procedure problems. I can only put mathematicians back on the right track. That whacking science on the incorrect procedure and showing how to do it correctly is my job as a former lawyer and magistrate. Solving all of it isn’t my job on the Social Contract with humanity. “Shut up and calculate” in physics is falsified as anti-scientific pseudo-science. *All *salads are equally important and must be dealt with in a balanced completely consistent way. The proper algorithm to interpret any space cake recipe is first to paint the whole picture salad, then communicate that even in your own brain via word salad, and then use quick and dirty course number salad and ultimately fine-number salad. A cyclic trial and error R&D process. QED!

**The Fourth LOE**: **Order Function**. The new drawn-on one A4 primarily pictures salad dynamic interactive geometry of the Order Function of the Cosmos and the Order function of the * Collective * human mammal brain. Axiomatically assumed completely consistent infinite cyclic Formation, Deformation, Transformation, Destruction & Reformation in an at the same time all the time dualistic analog and quantified way. The new Physics of Psychology Science. Providing the instruction manual for the individual and collective human brain to organize a Just durable completely consistent Humain Just Functional Order via all-inclusive Bildung. A fully tested artistic composition providing the scenario’s as input in the 3rd LOE. All important human endeavors such as organizing a Just society must comply. A dictate of the tyrannical physics of psychology. A very hard small nucleus is a dictate with an enormous space of freedom. QED!

This is a claimed proven best practice concept (now changed BTW) and thus not yet law but logically derived from the block model. That, the heartbeat of CM Newton comes to life I’ll show it some other time. This is just to show that they are claimed to be linked. Note the five different degrees of the order are the same yet also different waves of particle constructs in a dynamic particle medium.

**The Fifth LOE**: **Atomos Construct** in absolute nothing space as a proto-consciousness memory bank. With a musical life heartbeat via the 4th LOE as a dictate of classical mechanics due to form containing via reverse engineering all mathematically described numbers and constants. A known heartbeat effect when massive objects like a screwbolt move in space. Temporary resounding nonwaving no music by being crushed to death under max pressure in the cosmos. Then reaching maximum incidental speed in the cosmos. All above the speed of light. Proto-intelligent action is an intelligent reaction in a unique nonreproducible but within limits deterministically describable way. Playing out all possible scenarios in repeating Nirvana’s of space-time all the time. You only live once unique reincarnation identical paradox. Mass kg must be rigid, absolutely dense, and thus in perpetual motion by the laws of CM. It doesn’t bend, break, or get hotter or colder. Only this is completely consistent with our nonmagical existence and observations of superconductivity. The hits per timeframe in the observed cosmos require the smallest of building blocks to be able to build a whopping pressure vessel and DNA. Mine is claimed to be able to do just that. QED! That the way I do that is only a claimed concept is irrelevant to the proof of an LOE. Big Bang is a much smaller affaire in my model. Only one yet-to-be-formed galaxy is shot out of the crunch center of our hexagon pressure vessel as part of a whopping beehive. Much longer ago than science has the BB. The latter is the moment that this Champagne bubble to be, forms strings with its snowball Higgs particles in max spin in the dynamic matrix of the crust of a sphere in this pressure vessel. Gravity and light and DNA only exist in that crust. Akin the crust and atmosphere of the earth. Dynamic form repetition with a simple optical illusion of an expanding universe. It is akin to trains on the same track accelerating like bubbles and on different tracks at an angle having angular momentum. It only seems to expand in this simple interpretation. Simply add two timeframes: a slower than astronomical, cosmic timescale and one faster light wave nonwave resounding incidental max v. To falsify my concept you will have to first state to have studied it all and heard and reheard what my reaction is in a proper proceeding.

**The Sixth LOE**: **Infinite Space** is already dealt with the above as part of the holy trinity of interactive space-time. QED!

**The Seventh LOE: Absolute and Relative Time** as a human thought to describe observed interactive space-time. No beginning no end. The observed photon is above the speed of light. The speed of light is constant as an obvious average. Incidental quanta of maximum speeds > c are a logical dictate of the CM of Newton as stated above. Adding a quantum of mass reduces the speed vector with that “same” quantum. it starts to spin more. The energy must by the law of Newton stay the same. The cosmos is a perpetuum mobile in the sense of pantha rhei atomos, yet not a perpetuum mobile as a system that gives off more energy than it contains. Infinite speed is an occult notion and thus falsified in a valid way. QED!

**The Eighth LOE**: **Strong Interactive Force.** As stated above kg.m/s is a straight hard vector constructive and deconstructive push per time frame providing pressure. QED!

**The Ninth LOE**: **Weak interactive force**. As stated above kg.m/s^2. A soft contructive deconstructive soft force via a double snowflake snaring into a snowball effect causes angular momentum and thus slows down a quantum on the straight speed vector. Speeding up again after deconstruction. QED!

That this must be so is a law. How to construct that is a proven best practice testable concept. Not fully given yet here, for only proving the existence of the Ninth Law of Everything. My model can produce the eight Gluons that are plucked out of the Higgs Graviton fields in a curved space dynamic matrix more pushed and a bit pulled into little black holes as Glu-ins in strings and Glu-out magnetism. Lumps of strings the smaller they are the slower their max v in the matrix. Causing waves in the medium of the Higgs Graviton fields. Gravity is simply the underpressure surrounding black holes. This proves I have a concept on my blog via the presentation of this idea in this post.

**The Tenth LOE: Equality Inequality Duality **observation. This 10th LOE must split the physics of the cosmos into absolutely equal massive parts. The inequality can only be explained in a completely consistent way via possible unsplittable movement of a construct. Thus this poses valid falsification of the image of the construct of most elementary particles being built up out of two different size rigid massive objects. QED!

**GLOE THUS PROVEN AXIOM OF COMPLETE CONSISTENT COSMOS**

The entire model can be shown in one doodle graphic showing the healthy manic oversight of all that is to be thought about at the same time all the time. This can only be done by correctly teamed-up group thinking.

The new insight into the Hilbert space is say adding small areas of limited importance on the whole to the skeleton. When the problem is a hernia then the skeleton and muscles are most important. The heart of Hilbert isn’t then, albeit that the heart is critically important to one’s life. Always use any tools in the correct set theory box space-time time frame.

Most of this was already known but interpreted incorrectly leading to a win-lose instead of win-win humanity at work.

I’m only adding a slight but most fundamantal Twist.

The Theorems of Gill & Godel and the Nobel Prizes of 2022 proving Einstein wrong, are herewith falsified validly on the most fundamental probandum. For they even admit to not taking away the doubt about the fifth axiom of Euclid being an axiom. My model taking that fifth axiom as a fact proves in a best practice way via the largest circular argument covering most data ground that it is all solvable as one should expect assuming that we exist as part of a completely consistent cosmos.

**THE GRAND LAW OF HUMANITIES ELEMENTARY RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS**

Also on the Social Contract with Humanity holding:

**The Ten Rules of Procedures and Methodes of Non-Pseudoscience. **

Again an Open Source **Challenge** to pose Valid Falsification

(The Ten Most Fundamental Human Rights) *All improvements on the last blog post about these articles are in italics.*

These are according to common sense knowledge. On *serious *issues they must be interpreted in a ‘break one, you break all’ fashion. They each stand in a dualistic paragraph opposing tension. Furthermore, they also are always in a more or less balancing act tension as if they were on a tightrope.

*This is the basics of Just Law and thus something every high school kid should know!*

**Art. 1 – 1 Completeness versus Art. 1- 2 Incompleteness**

(1st LOE!)

Always take parts of the whole as one, when serious conflicts arise. Do not allow ankers of extreme gut feelings even as the last person standing intervene with the proper proceeding.

**Art. 2 – 1 Normality versus Art. 2 -2 Abnormaility**

(2nd LOE!)

Normality should show on average as normal. I.e. the norm. Yet, within the limits of this law abnormality is the rule for all individuals.

**Art. 3 -1 Just Proof versus Art 3. -2 Honest Mistakes**

(3rd LOE!)

In serious issues always follow the correct Just Proof proceeding. That is always correctly registered and can thus be checked as an exact science. That with hindsight a thus honest mistake has been made and needs correcting in review, doesn’t as such demand a change in the law. Or even a human scapegoat.

**Art. 4-1 Just Order versus Art. 4-2 Disorder**

(4th LOE!)

Repeated history shows that disorder leads to unjust order and thus war. Just order is only Justified when completely consistent with all these ten articles. That is only the case when the current Big Five assessment of personality types has been trained and teamed up properly on a specific problem and ultimately states their conviction in a proper proceeding. *(When that is done the block model will prove to be far superior to the Big Five assessment.)*

**Art. 5-1 Fact versus Art. 5-2 Doubt**

(5th LOE!)

Postulates (suspects) are hypothetical yet to be always proven via circumstantial evidence axioms (culprits) taken as absolutely true. A dynamic circular interactive process. Baring absolute proof of inherent doubt this logically requires inherently fallible convictions to have errors. These are on basis of Just Proof to be acknowledged and in review to be corrected. No scapegoat blame to be attached when the proceeding is proven to have been adhered to!

**Art. 6-1 Freedom versus Art. 6-2 Limiting Democratic Laws.**

(6th LOE!)

**Wer großes will, muß sich zusammenraffen;**

*in der Beschränkung zeigt sich erst der Meister;*

*und das Gesetz nur kann uns Freiheit geben.*

*Johann Wolfgang von Goethe*

**Art. 7-1 Timing versus Art. 7-2 Too Soon & Too Late**

(7th LOE!)

Due process is always in due time.

**Art. 8-1 Course versus Art. 8-2 Off Course**

(8th LOE!)

What are the Just goal and chosen Justifiable routes?

**Art. 9-1 Flow versus Art. 9-2 Rigidity**

(9th LOE!)

Justice always goes with the flow. *Hard on the smallest possible main point, soft on the many side issues.*

**Art. 10-1 Equality versus Art. 10-2 Inequality**

(10th LOE!)

The same cases are to be treated the same. Different cases are different in the degree of difference.

AGAIN: THESE ARTICLES ARE ALL TO ADHERE TO ALL THE TIME. THIS IS AN INTUITIVE BALANCING ACT OF A DUALISTIC NATURE. KNOW THE APPROPRIATE BANDWIDTHS THAT APPLY.

THE EXACT SCIENCE LIES IN THE ABILITY TO SHOW TO HAVE FOLLOWED THE PROPER PROCEEDING.

**THIS NEW PHYSICS OF HUMAN NATURE DICTATES:**

See the new Oracle Senate Test with Senators for life in the New Quattro Politica as a first test flight of a prototype built up out of parts that I have fully tested.

You can fact-check this claim in the footnotes of this post.

PROOF

No one in his or her right mind will deny that all my predictions in this one A4 doodle graphic on Donald Trump in October 2020 have come out. Just short of the total still preventable amok that is.

Most media are talking of World War 3 even going nuclear. A bit late and probably too late but in principle and adding new insights since then:

Save our Mighty Billionaires by building them a Golden Bridge way out.

More Millionaires No Poor No War

Peace in a Day is a Piece of Cake

With the benefit of hindsight, anyone can fact-check & conclude that had our large inherent oligarchs done what I gave as advice we wouldn’t have this global economic and political collapse for which I not only warned but also gave the Golden Bridge way out in this Trump doodle graphic.

The same goes for my whopping 100% score within my field of long years of expertise that anyone can fact check on my blog on what robot Putin would do given predictably unpredictable outcomes of the two black boxes: Kremlin Politics and War Outcome.

The same goes for my claim to have had a whopping 80% score on predictions since 2010 published in 2015 outside my field of expertise on what science would find in elementary physics and astronomy. Easier when knowing where to start looking by following correct procedure:

Shut up and first paint the whole picture. Then don’t shut up but talk also in your brain besides the collective brain to communicate this picture to the brains with the talent to calculate first quick and dirty and only then in rigorous fine scrutiny. The latter is still to be done. That doesn’t disprove but proves my claim. QED!

Humanity is standing before the Gates of Hell.

Support the Bloody Oracle Senates Test of the Quatro Politica!

Do or Die on your goal of No War but Peace and Prosperity via safety for all oligarchs.

· Permalink

I don’t know what you mean by “the Gill theorem”. I have proven lots of mathematical theorems in my scientific career. Just give me enough coffee and probably a theorem will come out soon. I have proven versions of Bell’s theorem with stronger assumptions and stronger conclusions. I like them, since they were actually used by the experimenters of the 2015-16 loophole free Bell experiments in order to get p-values robust against time effects in the physics of many repeated Bell trials on the same apparatus. They are the basis of my well known computer challenges to anyone who thinks that Bell’s theorem is false. Nobody calls this particular result “Gill’s theorem”. Like Bell’s theorem itself, the maths is pretty trivial. The physicists later improved it and generalised it, so the version used today is much better than the version I first proved in 2001 in order to win a bet against my friend Luigi Accardi. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0110137

· Permalink

Ah, that clarifies Bell’s theorem still being unsolvable by humans after what I as a nobody call Gill’s theorem. Your theorem improvement also still had the underlying problem unsolved. This is thus still the case after many subsequent improvements/alterations to Bell’s theorem.

And the mores being on only naming a theorem when we get a nontrivial improvement in mathematics. Okay. I misunderstood what you told me. A bit baffling to you call me a “crackpot Bell denier” and state that your contribution proves Bell’s inequalities to be (still) unsolvable. I didn’t know that this being unsolvable was already known by scientists in that field. For if not, then your improvement would not be trivial and thus should have been bestowed the honour of being called Gill’s theorem.

Well, all Bell adepts are dangerously mad ‘5th-axiom-deniers’. A serious error that Albert Einstein, Schrodinger, and Lewis Carroll pointed out as sciences predictably ended up in Alice in Wunderland.

As I point out that the main reason for granting this Nobel prize in physics is by the mighty mentally healthy authoritarian autistic oligarchs of the exact sciences to stay in power. The power of what to fund in science with mostly public money.

Whether these oligarchs know what they are doing or not. Mostly honestly convinced that this belief in the occult is the proven best practice because it incomprehensibly renders results.

They hope to keep the focus of the herd hypnotically fixed on their peer review judgment on what pseudoscience is and thus what is to be funded. Knowing full well that the herd and even the press will incorrectly conclude the following:

https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-win-physics-nobel-prize-for-proving-einstein-wrong

The Nobel committee has done no such thing. Einstein was proven right from the start that god doesn’t play dice and that spooky actions at a distance on what Bell’s theorem experiments entail aren’t in any way proof of best practice on gods laws. The latter is a dictate of logic being the probandum on the social contract with humanity concerning god i.e. the most fundamental questions. I.e. quite the contrary it leads to incomplete and inconsistent science logically thus misuse of funding, conflicts and war.

· Permalink

· Permalink

· Permalink

I recently discovered your blog, and I must say that I genuinely enjoyed reading your posts. I’m planning to subscribe to your updates, and I hope you continue to provide new content regularly.