**+ UPDATE ON HOW TO PROVE AN AXIOM OTHER THAN BY THEOREM VIA CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE-BASED CONVICTION**

INSPIRED BY A PRESENTATION “INTRO ON QM” IN THE PHILOSOPHICAL CAFE DORDRECHT GIVEN BY A PHYSICIST DOING HIS PH.D. HEREBY TWO BETTER WAYS OF SEEING MY MODEL ON THESE TWO POINTS

7-minute read

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose%E2%80%93Einstein_condensate

My Wikipedia style classicle mechanical (CM) understanding of the Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC).

Some years ago a Facebook friend physicist critically tested my model stating that it was erroneous to even think that it could be dealt with in a CM way posed a problem concerning BEC by a phenomenon I can’t find the term he used on my FB timeline (bloody FB), which was on Wikipedia but not in this Wikipedia page.

I’ll name it slow creep (SC). The atom slowly seems to shift from the center of the wave if as I understand it when you integrate the particle-wave duality.

In my quick and dirty geometry doodle graphic concept of BEC above the brown line I show my Wikipedia-style understanding of current physics on BEC. The flicking of the pebble over the pond metaphor idea.

DUALISTIC DATA RELIGIOUS CONVICTION

I improve my interpretation of the data on BEC. In my religious church data is dualistic. The object is one side of axiomatically existing data. The interactively moving massive atomos akin to gyroscopes in the instrument brain store the information as the other half of the dualistic data.

The proof is never possible by nigh perfect algebraic or less perfect geometry theorem. For that in my model only is possible in pure mathematics. The latter is meta-physics as part of Physica-Mayor (pronounce maior.) An axiomatic assumption can however be proven via an exact scientific circumstantial evidence proof and human conviction to be an axiom (the guilty culprit in continuous review metaphor) in physics-minor (current physics also containing applied mathematics).

Only Axiom deniers deny the 5th axiom of Euclid to be an axiom in physics-minor. The proof via the theorem of the fifth axiom is indeed impossible in pure mathematics being meta-physics.

NEW INSIGHT VIA COMBINING NEW INSIGHT ON DOUBLE SLIT EXPERIMENT

The new idea of seeing the dynamic matrix of the Higgs graviton field as a dance floor. At first, I had a boat being hosed by firehose through the lock gate metaphor guessing it’s probably electro-magnetism. The observer needs to be dancing at the same frequency as the particle that is to be observed. Because registration by machine is physical mass in movement the wave is transmitted via the dance floor to the particle.

That particle changes shape becoming polarized and thus the bow wave and the “ship” are then less wide. Then the particles no longer bang around in a superconductive way in the mirror of the glass and thus stay ahead of the stern wave that has the same frequency. No longer an interference pattern thus.

Photons thus always interact with each other in this model, yet in a way that creates the illusion of noninterference with the exception to that rule in the double slit experiment.

Having an incorrect interpretation of the M&M experiment and not grasping that a dynamic field is not inconsistent with the M&M experiment solves this conundrum. With my idea, we are allowed a dynamic field as the only way to not breach the axiom assuming that true magic and occultism are illegal.

Again occultism is also the case when everyone agrees that QM is weired and even a common sense solution is stated that can’t be proven to be inconsistent with all data. In this case infinite data in a completely consistent way. Anyone is challenged to pose valid falsification.

Demanding theorem proof is occult. That doesn’t mean to say that the numbers shouldn’t be done on this model. That is not my job as a lawyer magistrate. In a fair trial, I prove that it’s shut up and first paint the whole picture then communicate that in your own and other brains, and only then do shut up and calculate. Otherwise, it’s a proven illegal job. Catching such crooks is my expert job.

BACK TO BEC

And below the brown line how I now see BEC in a more advanced way.

In my model, the cosmos isn’t expanding other than as an easy-to-spot for types like me illusion. Our Milky Way is slowly accelerating upwards from the disc, whilst we spin around the whopping black hole in the center at a whopping constant 825,000 Km/h.

Akin making a video of a propellor of an aircraft the frequency needs to be correct to keep the prop on TV not create an illusion of turning the other way round or even forward or stationary.

Any kid with a Hocus Pocus box should know that when you can only observe half of the picture called the measurement problem due to the bars of the polarization you are probably being duped.

When cooling atoms down to nigh absolute zero degrees Kelvin then atoms become one atom. Heating it again they regain the atom form.

Religiously/hypnotically all current physicists aren’t allowed and thus not capable to understand that they became victims of their success. Giving them an addictive dopamine shot. Only an unbiased Delta (D-type) brain can easily spot this.

Creepy creep for when particles slowly accelerate and knowing that particles have a lower maximum speed the larger they are our end of DNA molecule times is ultimately coming. Hopefully still way past my time.

The scary bit for B-type healthy autistic types is, that they feel that are no longer masters of the exact sciences. That alas is an existential fear.

This again proves that my model works the best of all.

Anyone is challenged to pose valid falsification.

NB, It’s not yet possible to subscribe to my blog. If you want to follow this I’ll post all posts on my Facebook.